[Bonus] Part 12: It keeps the DEA in business
Marijuana activists can steer one of two courses:
- Taking what MLK termed “the tranquilizing drug of gradualism” [detailed in Reason 6], that is, passing crippled medical marijuana initiatives state-by-state.
- Allying with forces working to repeal federal marijuana prohibition — forces currently receiving little or no publicity — Cannabis Commerce’s voice crying in the wilderness notwithstanding.
Take a wild guess which one keeps the DEA in business?
The answer is obvious — even if no one could blame you for not realizing a choice even exists.
All you’re hearing and reading elsewhere is MMJ 24/7. Yet there’s a solid alternative to passing medical marijuana initiatives guaranteed to hogtie cannabis commerce.
That alternative is repealing prohibition.
Remember that?
Think back, way back to 2009, before medical married marijuana. “Legalize it” didn’t mean “medical marijuana.” It was all marijuana.
Approving crippled MMJ legislation sends the following signals to the DEA and the country at large:
- I am not worthy. I don’t believe my cause, herbal rights, rates the freedom other rights causes that preceded it [civil rights, women’s rights, gay rights] achieved after hard-won struggles. I am caving in by accepting a fraction of the freedom my birthright entitles me to. I agree to all the terms of surrender. It’s OK with me if local, state or federal governments decide to change those terms of surrender to harsher terms — any time they feel like it. Kick me. Beat me. Put me in chains.
- I reject “ask and ye shall receive,” sage advice courtesy of the man from Galilee. Instead, I opt for “don’t ask and ye shan’t receive.”
- I agree that it’s perfectly OK for cannabis to be subjected to peculiar and ever-changing regulations that no other substance in history has been saddled with as long as I can buy a couple of joints today.
- I can’t be trusted to make decisions for myself. Therefore, from this day on, I appoint city, county, state, and federal governments to be my nanny — and the DEA to enforce nanny’s whims and dictums.
- I agree with the DEA’s assessment that cannabis is a Schedule One drug. That also means I agree we shouldn’t be researching cannabis’ promising capability to fight cancerous tumors — federal law forbids clinical studies on Schedule One drugs.
- I agree to this deal with the devil in the sincere hope that the DEA leaves me alone, like the big bad wolf left the three little pigs alone.
- I agree the DEA can keep arresting people to the tune of 800,000 a year for marijuana offenses as long as I get “safe access to meds” in exchange.
- It’s fine with me if 45,000 people remain in prison for marijuana “offenses.” They aren’t my problem. It’s also OK with me if this number keeps increasing exponentially, as long as I can buy an activated brownie at a nearby dispensary.
- I agree that the Drug Enforcement Agency should be funded for the long haul, as opposed to disbanded like yesterday.
- I agree that no one should ever profit from “selling drugs.”
Despite tripping over themselves to give away their power to the DEA, organizers in some prospective medical marijuana states are hoping against hope that they can build “protection” against the same militant outfit into the language of their proposed amendments.
The gist of these is, “Would you please not blow my house down?”
Patient-centric groups — like my good buddies over at Americans for Safe Access (ASA) — are aghast they don’t have protection already. They could certainly use some protection. ASA points to a 2009 memo from President Obama, delivered by administration mouthpiece Deputy Attorney General David Ogden, suggesting the feds might want to call off the dogs in MMJ states.
Here’s the pertinent sentence in the Ogden memo:
As a general matter, they [the DEA] should not focus federal resources on individuals whose actions are in clear and unambiguous compliance with existing state laws providing for the medical use of marijuana.
A “general matter,” whatever that is, falls far short of an executive order commanding the DEA to stand down. Does ASA actually expect DEA agents to twiddle their thumbs all day at taxpayers’ expense? It would appear that the answer is, “yes.”
So, do you think those rough-and-ready dudes are getting into the spirit of cooperation with ASA, playing ping-pong, working on Sudoku puzzles, and painting Tibetan sand mandalas from 9–5? C’mon. They’re looking for fields to eradicate and “drug profits” to seize. That’s what the DEA does. That’s what every American taxpayer including you pays them to do.
In case you’ve come lately to this mirth and merriment, federal law clearly and unambiguously states that marijuana is a 100% illegal Schedule One drug along with heroin, cocaine, and oxycontin. The federal government provides ample budget and manpower for the DEA to pursue, prosecute, and incarcerate marijuana “offenders.”
Laws passed in medical marijuana states may or may not supersede federal antidrug laws or provide “patients” and businesses that jumped through all the necessary hoops with get-out-of-jail free cards.
Where these sets of black and white laws intersect, gray areas form.
What’s not gray is the undisputable fact that a memo is as far away from a law as the Milky Way is from the Andromeda galaxy.
ASA and patient-centric groups struggle with this unalterable reality.
They somehow miss the point that the DEA, with over 10,800 employees, including at least 5,500 special agents on its payroll, has a mission to carry out. These special agents joined an enforcement agency because they had a hankering for action, adventure, and annihilation — not suspended animation.
By the way, if the notion of setting fire to fields or seizing immense stashes of cash sounds appealing, contact Special Agent Recruiter Mark Waller at 212-337-2941.
If everyone remains fixated on MMJ in the USA, you could enjoy a long and prosperous career.
According to the DEA’s always entertaining website, which presents psychedelic Jimi Hendrix posters as hard evidence of the deadly peril which must be stamped out, displays a wall of plaques commemorating the heroic DEA agents who died in the line of duty when they happened upon fields not patrolled by hippy peaceniks, and celebrates the capture of a drug-running super-submarine:
Becoming a Special Agent with the DEA is a competitive process. After receiving a conditional offer of employment, recruits must then make it through a 16 week rigorous training which consist of firearms proficiency including basic marksmanship, weapons safety, tactical shooting, and deadly force decision training. In order to graduate, students must maintain an academic average of 80 percent on academic examinations, pass the firearms qualification test, successfully demonstrate leadership and sound decision-making in practical scenarios, and pass rigorous physical task tests. Upon graduation, recruits earn themselves the title of DEA Special Agent.
Speaking of rigorous physical tasks, I would supplement the curriculum to include specialized training in “how to pick up chicks.”
After all, lotsa hot chicks are femme fatale drug fiends.
The DEA has buildings and training facilities throughout the United States — and all over the globe. Or were you unaware that the DEA maintains 83 foreign offices in 63 countries?
If we colonize Mars, the DEA will undoubtedly deploy a mating couple to insure that over the eons colonists will remain on the straight and narrow.
Contrary to what some might think, the DEA, like the universe, is expanding, not contracting.
To be precise, the DEA has 226 Domestic Offices in 21 Divisions throughout the U.S., maintaining division offices in San Francisco, Los Angeles, San Francisco, Seattle, Phoenix, El Paso, Denver, Houston, Dallas, New Orleans, Chicago, St. Louis, Detroit, Atlanta, Miami, Philadelphia, Boston, New York, and Newark.
The main DEA fortress in Arlington, VA. is one of nineteen DEA-connected buildings in and around the District of Columbia.
Oh, and its annual budget exceeds $2.4 billion.
So, with about 11,000 employees to keep occupied, and $2.4 billion allocated toward that end, when the DEA huffs and puffs about how it doesn’t necessarily recognize every state’s oddball medical marijuana policies, it can blow that house down.
The current widely-circulated lead story at the DEA site leaves no room for doubt:
California’s Top Federal Law Enforcement Officials Announce Enforcement Actions Against State’s Widespread and Illegal Marijuana Industry
OCT 7 — SACRAMENTO, Calif. – The four California-based United States Attorneys today announced coordinated enforcement actions targeting the illegal operations of the commercial marijuana industry in California.
The statewide enforcement effort is aimed at curtailing the large, for-profit marijuana industry that has developed since the passage of California’s Proposition 215 in 1996. That industry has swelled to include numerous drug-trafficking enterprises that operate commercial grow operations, intricate distribution systems and hundreds of marijuana stores across the state — even though the federal Controlled Substances Act makes illegal the sale and distribution of marijuana.
The operative word is illegal. The word “widespread” was carefully selected to make you feel unsafe because the threat is all around you. When you feel unsafe and threatened, fascist measures employed to “insure your safety” are justified. Like closing down another 400 dispensaries to show the DEA wasn’t whistling Dixie.
I’ll reserve analysis of the dirty words “for profit” for a future article; I’m not going after the DEA much here because it’s a target already already, the criticism is neither new or fresh, and I can’t blame the agency for carrying out its mandate. Obviously, the bigger villain to me is patient rights groups who have demonstrated no feel for playing David to the DEA’s Goliath. It’s the groups that have been given a free pass so far, that have been begging to be taken to task, that find themselves in Cannabis Commerce’s crosshairs. A Chief Executive, who for the life of him cannot conceive of cannabis as an economic contributor, is also squarely in those sights.
That would be the same President who’s opted to stand down as the DEA reasserts its might.
But the problem is hardly confined to patient rights groups and the Chief Executive.
The phantasmagoric reality is that the entire country has gone ga-ga over medical marijuana at the same time it’s completely lost sight of repealing prohibition. That serves to embolden the DEA’s resolve to let everyone know, in no uncertain terms, that it’s still a player. Make that a big player. A very big player delaying its ride into the sunset as long as possible.
It may be big, it may be entrenched, and it might appear to be impregnable, but a tremendously powerful yet nonviolent weapon exists that can and will blast the DEA from here to eternity.
Repealing prohibition via marching on Washington in unprecedented numbers is the slingshot that can fell the DEA. That will dismantle it, vaporize it, and, to borrow its favorite word, eradicate it. At the very least, the agency would be neutered to the point of irrelevance.
Herbal rights, the only individual liberty left Washington hasn’t been forced by heroic marchers to “grant,” is a noble concept.
You’d think people would be all over it.
But they’re not.
Not by a long shot.
That’s because there’s a crisis in leadership.
NORML, the activist group that’s best known and has been around the longest, has a startling history of ineffectiveness. It’s lost the War For Drugs as certainly as the DEA’s lost the War Against Drugs.
Even the Drug Policy Alliance, formed to fight the “War on Drugs,” is on record as advocating MMJ only. Its clearly stated stance is: “Cannabis should be legal for the medicinal purposes of severely ill individuals.”
Why are the media, politicians, and patient rights groups [which, alas, NORML has morphed into] agonyizingly shortsighted?
Periodically, collective insanity prevails.
The most notable example in US history is Congress’ 1964 reaction to then President Lyndon B. Johnson’s imploration to pass the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, for all intents and purposes a declaration of war on North Vietnam. History has shown that a made-up, false-flag incident — an attack by North Vietnamese gunboats on a US warship which just happened to be cruising through the Gulf of Tonkin, maybe it veered off course cause it was foggy off the coast of Kauai or something — was the rationale LBJ provided for escalating an “unofficial war.”
In congress, only Senators Wayne Morse from Oregon and Ernest Gruening from Alaska stood against it. The House of Representatives passed it 416–0.
Then it was déjà vu all over again in 2001, when Congress unanimously gave George Bush the power to rush to judgment in Iraq, the better to seek out weapons of mass destruction which never existed.
How do those decisions look now?
I’ll leave you with one more instance of collective insanity. Let’s go way back to 2006, when a dramatic and artificial increase in home values and the stock market housing market was peaking. The popular message was: buy, buy more, buy all the houses you can, buy all the stocks you can. Prices will keep rising 10, 20, even 50 percent a year.
Collective insanity. Then the bubble burst.
Well, this medical marijuana bubble’s going to burst big-time.
Then everyone will realize that in 2011 fixating on crippled MMJ initiatives as opposed to working to repeal federal prohibition was collective insanity, too.
Meanwhile, the fact virtually all herbal rights activists remain focused on “winning” crippled MMJ legislation is met with unbridled joy by the DEA. The drug czar is singing in the shower over it, because activists’ lack of self-belief preserves the good old boy network he presides over — and all is well.
Without an immediate course correction, taxpayers will continue footing the bill for DEA salaries and retirement funds.
As things stand, patient rights groups might as well adopt the slogan: “Medical Marijuana — Keeping the DEA in Business.”
Table of Contents:
Part 1: Dynamic MMJ laws force businesses onto the streetPart 2: MMJ limits cannatax to a fraction of what it could be
Part 3: MMJ limits job incubation to a fraction of what it could be
Part 4: MMJ limits cannabis' contribution to GDP to a fraction of what it could be
Part 5: Ironically, MMJ blocks clinical research into cannabis’ healing properties
Part 6: It's taking the tranquilizing drug of gradualism
Part 7: The foot-in-the-door theory is flawed
Part 8: Emphasizing MMJ in the present pushes true legalization back to the future
Part 9: MMJ trivializes recreational and industrial use
Part 10: Fuck the patients
[Bonus] Part 11: It keeps 45,000 pot "offenders" imprisoned
[Bonus] Part 12: It keeps the DEA in business
[Bonus] Part 13: Cities and counties can vote it out anytime
7 comments
Thomas Chong says:
Jul 25, 2011
You must remember medical marijuana has opened the door that can never be shut again so rather than oppose or criticize the the “medical approach”, embrace it. The truth is we all smoke for a medical reason whether we know it or not. Stress relief is probably the number one “medical” reason we healthy people smoke it. “It relaxes me”. ” Helps me enjoy my time off” or helps me enjoy doing boring things. Airline pilots use it for long flights. Athletes use it to wind down after a hard game or practice. Stress relief. But the most compelling argument has to be the “take it or leave it” qualities. Pot is not physically addicting. Studies have shown people who smoked for years can and have stopped cold turkey with no physical side effects. And the good news is stopping a heavy pot habit can be beneficial to ones well being. So don’t get cute and knock the medical approach and realize the number one harmful addiction in America is junk food.
This addiction is killing Americans faster than drunk drivers. Over eating leads to heart problems, diabetics, and a host of other ailments that is encouraged by our so-called American culture of television ads and sit/coms that promote unhealthy habits as a way of life rather than a way of death. Pot, hemp, cannibis was given to us by our Creator when the Universe was created.”I give thee Green Herb and it shall be for meat” Genesis 29. And it was the disgraced President Nixon who gave us the DEA criminal gang and the money draining drug laws. So lets support the medical approach toward pot and educate the masses about the many ills pot can help with instead of trying to be ultra clever with the outlaw comedian approach….tc
Lory Kohn says:
Jul 25, 2011
I could take exception to several of your points. However, you are the co-author of the immortal lines:
mama try to tell me
try to tell me how to live
but I don’t listen to her
cause my head is like a sieve
So you can write whatever you want, whenever you want to write it, and I’ll be grateful for the contribution. Thank you for taking the time to comment.
Don McAdams says:
Oct 15, 2011
Len Richmond’s movie is excellent. Under your picture of the youtube video, you state that, “Schedule 1 drugs can’t be tested on humans.” This is actually not the case. NIDA has a mandate that no Schedule 1 drugs can be tested for any benefits, but tests for potential harm are ran all the time. For a host of research, I recommend, well, Len Richmond’s movie. As something just as valuable, if not more so, is this 20 minute seminar from Dr. Abrams, http://projectcbd.org/Medicine.html#CME . He has over 30 years of NIDA funded MJ research that he talks about, as well as other research being done around the world, Dr. Guzman’s work from Spain being the most ground-breaking to date, mitigating glioblastoma multiforme, or brain tumors. Then I would suggest Dr. Tashkin’s NIDA funded 30+ year study confirming no link to MJ and lung cancer – it even suggested a protective effect from the cigarette smokers. I agree with Tommy Chong and Jack Herer – all use is medical. That being said, the MMJ initiatives may have a huge flaw of not offering enough, especially in the way of research, but it was a necessary step. We would never be talking about full legalization or repealing Prohibition 2 in a serious tone today if it wasn’t for the MMJ road paved for US. And yes, certain indicas high in CBD are better for physical treatments, while sativas high in THC and THCV are better for mental treatments, so recommended strains for the ailments isn’t entirely voodoo… You do bring up a necessary reminder for US all, though – no matter if we’re doing a medical or recreational attempt, research should always be included in the wording…
Lory Kohn says:
Oct 19, 2011
I disagree with your theory that MMJ is paving the way for full legalization, as opposed to blocking it — but respect your opinion. More on this soon. btw, is cannabis effective against spam?
Don McAdams says:
Oct 25, 2011
There is some truth that if Cali would have fully legalized cannabis in ’96, we could likely have 16 legal states today instead of medical states. The growing plethora of medical research could very likely have kept cannabis in a medical box for some time, and may have slowed the repeal / legalize progress. Considering how rigid the government still is on “legalizing,” though, medical really was (and unfortunately still is for the most part) the best avenue to get some freedom. I agree that there needs to be a break from medical to legal, and that would have been nice to see happen already. I believe that its lack of harm and vast medical efficacy will create a rapid shift from medical to repeal very soon, though, and that, almost unarguably, would have never been possible had cannabis not been a hot topic already these past several years, and that would have never happened without mmj initiatives being passed by the People. Perhaps it’s not really a paved road. It’s more like a dirt trail, and we need to get on the interstate. I agree with your sentiment of abandoning the medical model now, that time has come, but it’s not as easy to say for the 34 states that have no mj allowances… Our legalization init is lagging in Ohio, and still has all the hoops to get through yet, while the medical init here has jumped through the last hoop and is now collecting the half million signatures needed to get it on the ballot for 2012. I’m still gonna support both efforts, even though I have no qualifying medical condition…
Lory Kohn says:
Oct 25, 2011
Don, thanks for providing those links and sources to the groundbreaking research that has been performed.
You seem to like to write a bit — how’s about writing an article for CC clarifying what research can and can’t be performed on Schedule One drugs in the USA, and perhaps contrasting those regulations with international regulations?
I will admit that there have been benefits that have evolved from the flirtation with MMJ. For example, it has really pushed the envelope in medibles. I’ll be at my “caregiver,” Evergreen Apothecary today, listening to customers’ tales of how medibles have been helping them with their conditions, a variation on the “treat yourself” theme …
air jordan 11 says:
May 27, 2016
I want to say – thank you for this!